A rare war powers resolution that attempted to restrict President Donald Trump’s right to employ military force in Venezuela was essentially vetoed by Republicans in the U.S. Senate. Following a U.S. operation that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, Trump suffered an unexpected setback when the proposal advanced in a procedural vote last week when five Republican senators joined Democrats in support. Many saw the vote as a criticism of the president’s choice to approve the operation without notifying the Senate Armed Services Committee. As the White House began a vigorous lobbying campaign to thwart the resolution, Trump swiftly attacked the Republican defectors on social media. On Wednesday, Senate Republicans employed a procedural tactic to strip the resolution of its “privileged” status, which would have allowed it to pass with a simple majority. They argued the rule did not apply because there were no ongoing hostilities in Venezuela.   The move made passage virtually impossible. With Republicans holding a 53–47 majority in the Senate, Democrats lack the numbers needed to meet the new 60-vote threshold required for approval.   “Trump claims his war in Venezuela is righteous. If that’s the case, why is he browbeating his party into using a procedural scheme to avoid a debate and vote in Congress in front of the American people?” said Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia.     Kaine introduced the resolution after U.S. special forces captured Maduro in Caracas on January 3, saying it was intended to reaffirm Congress’s constitutional authority to declare war. The measure would have required Trump to seek congressional approval before taking further military action in Venezuela. Two of the five Republicans who initially supported the resolution later reversed their positions after receiving assurances from Secretary of State Marco Rubio that there were no plans to deploy ground troops and that Congress would be consulted if that changed.     Following the initial vote, Trump warned that the five senators should “never be elected to office again.”   Even if the resolution had passed the Senate, it was largely symbolic. It faced almost certain defeat in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives and would have required a two-thirds majority in both chambers to override a presidential veto. Democrats framed the effort as a constitutional stand after what they described as months of misleading briefings, including assurances as recently as November that there were no plans for military action on Venezuelan soil.     The White House defended the operation as legally justified, describing it as part of a broader campaign against transnational drug trafficking and targeting cartels designated as terrorist organisations.   While some Republicans initially warned the operation could draw the U.S. into deeper involvement without congressional oversight, Trump has since insisted that such efforts are necessary for national security. He has also suggested U.S. involvement in Venezuela could last for years and has shared online posts portraying himself as “Acting President of Venezuela.”   Since Trump returned to office, similar war powers resolutions related to Venezuela have been rejected four times in Congress. Over the past century, only one congressional measure has successfully imposed a lasting limit on unilateral presidential military action abroad: the War Powers Resolution of 1973.