Amber Heard is ‘broke’ due to mounting legal fees, can’t pay Johnny Depp $10.4m in damages

Due to growing legal bills linked with the bombshell defamation trial, Amber Heard is reportedly ‘poor’ and unable to pay her ex-husband, Johnny Depp, more than $10 million in damages.

The high-profile televised court battle came to a close this week when a seven-member jury determined that Depp and Heard had defamed each other, but found in Depp’s favor.

After a six-week trial involving allegations and counterclaims of domestic abuse, the jury awarded him $10.35 million in damages, compared to $2 million for Heard.

Asked on NBC’s TODAY show if Heard will be able to pay up, her lawyer Elaine Bredehoft said: “Oh no, absolutely not.”

 Amber Heard is

She added that the Aquaman star will appeal the verdict and “has some excellent grounds for it”.

Heard’s net worth has been estimated at between $1.5 and $2.5 million as of Thursday, according to the Celebrity Net Worth site and other outlets, a far cry from what she now owes Depp in the wake of the jury’s ruling.

But sources told The New York Post the actress is “broke” due to hefty legal fees associated with the bombshell defamation trial.

The high-profile court battle with her ex-husband has left the 36-year-old actress hurting for cash, according to sources, including one who also placed the blame on Heard’s past lavish spending, on travel, clothes, gifts and wine.

Multiple sources said the “Aquaman” star had to switch legal representation and is now relying on her homeowners insurance policy to cover the cost of her current lawyers in the case.

The bill for Heard’s lawyer has mostly been footed by The Travelers Companies under terms of the actress’ insurance policy, sources said.

A vice president of the insurance firm, Pamela Johnson, was spotted in the Fairfax, Virginia court with Heard multiple times throughout her trial. Neither Johnson nor Travelers returned calls from The Post.

The 58-year-old Depp, who lost a libel case against the British tabloid The Sun in London in 2020 for calling him a “wife-beater,” celebrated the split verdict in the case as a victory while Heard said she was “heartbroken”.

Depp sued Heard over an op-ed she wrote for The Washington Post in December 2018 in which she described herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse”.

The Texas-born Heard did not name Depp in the piece, but he sued her for implying he was a domestic abuser and sought $50 million in damages.

The 36-year-old Heard countersued for $100 million, saying she was defamed by statements made by Depp’s lawyer, Adam Waldman, who told the Daily Mail her abuse claims were a “hoax”.

Bredehoft said Depp’s legal team worked to “demonise” Heard and suppressed crucial evidence in the trial, preventing the jurors from examining evidence of Depp’s alleged abuse.

Related Video

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.